Benefits of International Traffic in Arms Regulations ITAR
What exactly is ITAR?
As the title suggests, the ITAR is the legislation regulating munition trade. While that description is correct, it leaves a number of unanswered questions. What is ammunition? Why does it describe trade in munition? Who is interested in this trading, what authorizations are needed to be received from U.S. exporters and international resellers and how will they acquire them? What ITAR enforcement procedures are you now needed to comply with?
Not all munitions are eligible for the ITAR, although, in the common context of the word, those things that are not will be called explosives. Throughout the United States Munitions List, qualified products are listed for ITAR purposes. The USML’s classified into 21 sections, each covering papers that are essentially identical (e.g., combat aircraft and defined subassemblies). Growing groups of USML also defines technical details under its purview – that is, managed knowledge related to munitions.
One feature found in the ITAR which caused a lot of confusion amongst exporters was a section on “catch-all” coverage for specially built or changed parts and/or components for other USML articles. This description captured several things that could have been converted to be used as pieces of guns, however, were not arms of themselves and may have become almost indistinguishable from pieces made for use in civilian applications.
Because of the export control regulation reforms being introduced, the ITAR now has a less stringent concept of what sections and components are “specially built” for USML papers. In parallel with this shift, most sections and items were transferred from the jurisdiction of the USML to the jurisdiction of the Department of Commerce. However, even though these changes have been introduced with certain USML types, the ITAR also has a large amount of things to do.
In transactions including USML equipment and technological details, the ITAR sets stringent specifications. For a few exceptions, authorization from the State Department for exports as well as temporary imports used in USML goods is required. Unique laws for certain countries culminated in security exchange arrangements with countries like Australia as well as the UK. The delivery of security facilities, which may provide combat preparation and assistance, is another field of ITAR reporting. U.S. exporters of USML goods are now required to file with the US State Department on an annual basis, and for non-exporting suppliers are also required. The ITAR often controls trade in non-U.S.-originated weapons as engaged by U.S. entities and their international counterparts.
Commercial benefits because of this U.S. legislation
The opportunity to re-export or retransfer products under the EAR rather than the ITAR would result in a decrease in lead times involved with securing U.S. regulatory permits, thus decreasing total procurement costs for companies supplying U.S. sourcing military facilities and resources around the world.
Therefore, the EAR provides a more balanced definition of citizens of dual and third countries than the ITAR. Firms around the world, who grasp where the boundaries are between ITAR and EAR will handle their human capital more skillfully and cost-effectively. Some businesses, for example, may reduce the red tape involved with securing security clearances or handling expensive exemption schemes under anti-discrimination laws, none of which could be needed for certain post-reform initiatives.
Industries who want to consider the effect of legislation on their activities, and how to take advantage of the flow of papers and innovations from the USML to the CCL, would be awarded the opportunity to compete more competitively for both Defense and business contracts. When products have passed from the ITAR to the EAR, there is no need to sign a TAA or equivalent arrangement until presenting the details needed to file an application or contract for the use of such things, however, authorization might be necessary in certain cases.
Additionally, the ITAR taint problem is greatly diminished with the transfer of too many papers from the USML to the CCL, enabling industries to more competitively import replacement parts, tooling, and other hardware. Moreover, the amendments would result in more subcontractors being allowed to compete on contracts in both the US and elsewhere, where they were historically barred from doing so because of ITAR constraints.
Take advantage of the benefits now with ISO Pros
As a result of the ITAR revisions, all ITAR classifications which have not been updated to reflect the legislative reforms are now incorrect. Additionally, though there are grandfathering clauses on current US-issued export approvals. With the Department of State, those provisions will not remain indefinitely available. Ultimately, to accommodate the amendments to the ITAR, both ITAR Arrangements and Security contractor contracts would need to be revised.
Unfortunately, several businesses felt obligated to wait for guidance from manufacturers and corporate associates to handle the transfer phase, including deciding the authority and classification of publications that were previously regulated by ITAR. This really is not the case. In addition to placing their regulatory records at risk, firms waiting for guidance face the possibility of missing out on big contracts because their tenders would cost more than a rival who knows the benefits of making the move to the EAR efficiently and effectively. Therefore it is crucial that firms aiming to stay successful in tendering for vital Security and trade contracts consider the effect of regulatory reforms in the U.S.
The FAQs further specify that, with the degree that exporters and/or foreign entities are in proper faith adopting the frameworks proposed which have been revised by the law of 2015 on the procurement by defense services by U.S. persons overseas, which, amongst other items, included an exception for a U.S. contractor of any foreign person under certain circumstances, DDTC would generally consider the delivery for defense services by the U.S.
For more clarity on, inter alia, the specific information needed for the authorization request and the conditions to be fulfilled before the authorization request is sent, please see the full text of the FAQs.
Contact ISO Pros, your ITAR experts
Also if a non-US corporation does not participate in defense exports but sells solely to the domestic sector and has goods containing some ITAR-controlled parts, which includes ITAR-controlled technological details in its manufacturing, it has to provide a thorough knowledge of the ITAR. Not only will this organization put in place mechanisms to better track ITAR-controlled goods and technological records, but it must also ensure that there is enough authorisation from the State Department to deal with certain documents.
A company that handles U.S. controlled items has a duty of care to ensure that it implements a system for managing such items within the terms of the license or agreement applicable. Therefore, for ITAR enforcement, an organization must be prepared to show that it is liable for recognizing and monitoring ITAR articles and transmitting essential details across the supply chain in order to ensure that the products are recognized as being regulated under ITAR.